Earlier this week I finished a book I’d been pecking at for the past week or two. It was a good book, and I really enjoyed it; the reason it was taking so long was because I didn’t have a lot of reading time, what with playing on the Wii and catching up on the show I’d missed while away [1]. Oh, and knitting up a storm. So I finished that book, put it back on my shelf and went to get the next book, which was…
Don’t you hate it when that happens? You’re reading a book, and you have a pretty good idea of what you want to read next, or you have a stack of books waiting to to be read. When you finish that book, you can move on immediately to the next one on the shelf/stack. [2] However, this time I was caught between reading lists/stacks, so I didn’t know what to read. Honestly, I wandered around for a day in a fog because I needed to read something, but I didn’t know what.[3]
Fortunately, I remembered that I’d been saving The Night Watch by Sergei Lukyanenko, and I’ve been happily engaged with it since Tuesday. It’s very good, and so far it only bears a passing resemblance to the movie. [4]
Incidentally, I know I haven’t posted my list of books I read last night, and there’s a good reason for that: I can’t find the notebook I record them in. It’s also problematic because I have a couple of other books to write down in it (I’m paranoid that I’ll loose the post-it notes I’m using to keep track of them.) All I can tell you is that the Stephen Fry book I put in the August read list was actually read in September. It was a terrible error, I accept responsibility for my actions, and I promise to not let it happen again.
(Insert non-threatening musical interlude)
I just went upstairs to fetch the power cord for my laptop (I’m sitting at the dining room table, and the battery was running low) and - lo and behold! - found my notebook under a stack of papers that had fallen over.
~ Lee Gowan, The Last Cowboy (7)
I was expecting slapstick and goofiness; instead, I got sad, beautiful poignancy (is that a word? Spell check says “yes”!) Genius.
~ Meghan McCaffery, Sloppy Firsts (7.5)
Very teen-agnsty. Marcus, the male “interest”, reminded me a lot of all of Sarah Dessen’s male “interest” characters.
~ Penn Jillett, Sock (6)
I can’t think of any other way of describing this book except to say it was a very muscular read. The narrator is a sock monkey, which might normally have you rolling your eyes, but it was very well done. The narration itself was very choppy, with a lot of pop culture references. Although it had a strong beginning, I thought it started dragging some by the end.
~ Susan Elizabeth Phillips, Natural Born Charmer (7)
Despite the fact that the plot elements were almost identical to every other book she’s written, I still love her books. Is this how people who love Danielle Steele and John Grisham feel?
~ Timothy Taylor, Stanley Park (8.5)
While I don’t think I completely understood the significance of the case of the murdered children, or the Professor’s research, I thoroughly enjoyed this book. I know John of The Book Mine Set didn’t like this one when he read it for Canada Reads last year, but having read a plethora of books about chefs and restaurants and the challenges of working in a professional kitchen, I have a completely different perspective on his actions at the end of the story.
And that was it for the month. Based on my “finished” date for the last one, it was around the time things started heating up at work, and I didn’t have a lot of time for reading.
[1] I have a PVR for my dish. It was an extravagance, but worth it.
[2] Anyone? Anyone? Or am I the only one who goes through books that fast?
[3] Again, this may be a problem unique to me and a very few other book nerds.
[4] Which was AWESOME. Seriously - it made the special effects in The Matrix look cheap and poorly executed.